A.H. Robins Case Study.

Case Study Outline. This essay get out(a) discuss the case where A.H. Robins ground unethical decisions that caused resulted in unspoilt ramifications for their customers and the familiarity. A.H. Robins purchased the party Dalkon Shield in 1970 (Nelson & angstrom unit; Trevino, 2004, p.203). The company was manufacturing a devise c entirelyed an IUD (intrauterine device). At this time, the culture of the country was very hip on broth control devices (T. Donihi, personal communication, October 4, 2005). A.H. Robins see a clear panorama to capitalize on this bare-assed proceeds that was sure to look more profit. Symptoms of Problems. This IUD was a new intersection for A.H. Robins because it had neer carried such a overlap before. A.H. Robins was a manufacturer of cristal Stick and Robitussin cough syrup (Nelson &type A; Trevino, 2004, p.203). There was no history at all of A. H. robins ever venturing into this reference of product. It is sound off that A.H. Robins was only thinking of the marketing and potential sales, and not as well as practically on examen the product out first. even up if A.H. Robins were to try to test out the product, they had no gynecologists or obstetrician on staff (Nelson & Trevino, 2004, p.203). This turned out to be a problem by and by because the scientists that A.H. Robins had on staff were of no use in determine if the IUDs were safe.

How can a company know if a product is going to be ill-timed unless the product undergoes some type of clinical political shake up? A.H. Robins got forward without the clinical testing because IUDs were considered medical devices and not pharmaceutical drugs at the time (Nelson & Trevino, 2004, p.203). Root Problems. Since there was no clinical trial testing required, A.H. Robins resolute to sell the device and women were having them implanted. hither was a... If you exigency to get a full essay, order it on our website: Orderessay

If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: How it works.