Intention in Criminal Cases

The key issue in this case is Intention. The big question, which I will try to answer, is whether or not Chris and Dorris intended to spill over down Andrew. Intention jackpot often be relate to the Mens Rea, which can also be described as the inculpative mind. close to crimes have to have included a Mens Rea and an Actus Reus. With come forward the Mens Rea at that place is no crime unless a sympathyable man could counter the outcome. then Chris could be held liable for the wipeout of Andrew even though he did not intend to kill him, his only intentions were to dispense with Bill. The reason for this is that Doris a doctor gave her professional opinion to him, which gave him the hypermetropia of the death and made him liable. However Chris would have a keep down of defense forces the first-year would be that he had a duty to fulfil, as a fireman he has the duty of saving lives. If he exactly omitted to broaden out his duty then he would be in breach of his contract ed service to the public. So he had to act in the correct way as to how he felt was best. It could also be argued that he acted out of essential and chose the lesser of two evils.

The first option he had was to repudiate the both of them and allow them go wrong, the second was to let one die and save the other. The first option was the tally action to carry out and the second was the better of actions. So his actions were just. Necessity working as a complete defence however there is some confusion as to when requirement is involved as the courts are not clear as to whether it works or not. They have developed Duress of Circumstance, If you sine qua non to get a full essay, order it on ou! r website: OrderEssay.net

If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: write my essay